Some would say that we will not achieve net zero in the cafes, dinner parties and wine bars of our inner cities.
As a new community group located in Brisbane’s inner-city suburb of West End, Zero-Net Kurilpa is looking to change that perception and respond to the challenge of decarbonising our cities.
We are a group of volunteers who have come together to progress greater climate change action across Brisbane, seeking a safe climate future through community-led action, partnerships and advocacy.
We have a big vision and a big plan. Zero-Net Kurilpa is part of the Zero Emissions Brisbane network, the aim is to work in partnership with the community to achieve 100% renewable energy and Zero-net emissions within 5 to 10 years. What we trial and pilot in West End, we can then share with other local Ward-based groups across the City of Brisbane.
Glasgow Shame Job
The message from November’s CoP26 in Glasgow was that all countries must double their efforts to avoid catastrophic climate change.
Australia has rightly been criticised in Glasgow. Australia has renewable energy natural resources that make us the envy of the world and with the right policy settings, we could become a renewable energy superpower and global leader.
As part of the Zero Emissions Brisbane network, we are advocating for the Climate Council’s recommended science-based target of 75% reduction of current level of emissions by 2030 and net zero emissions by 2035.
Brisbane’s Carbon Emissions Profile
The greenhouse emissions from across the City of Brisbane are still increasing and with no indication of peaking.
In 2019, with a population of 1,253,982 the City of Brisbane emitted 24.4 Mega Tonnes of greenhouse emissions.
Where the City of Brisbane is the local government area, covering 26 wards and managed by the Brisbane City Council the largest and most resourced council in Australia.
As a comparison, Brisbane’s carbon emissions profile represented approximately:
- 16% of Qld emissions with 24% of Qld population.
- 5% of Australia’s emissions with 5% of Australia’s population.
As electricity and transport are Brisbane’s highest sources of emissions, with 60% from electricity use, 28% from transport and 6% from use of gas.
Communities Doing it for Themselves
When I talk to people in our community, we are highly skilled and educated and we are agreed – we need to be the leaders we are waiting for.
In the absence of government leadership there is plenty we can do as a community and help one another in decarbonising our suburb and our City.
We won’t be alone here, we are taking inspiration from communities such as Zero Emissions Noosa, Zero Emissions Sydney North, Zero-Net Hepburn and over 100 other communities across Australia that are doing it for themselves.
Zero Emissions Noosa is working with the Noosa Shire Council to achieve the endorsed target of net-zero by 2026. As a result of Zero Emissions Noosa’s efforts the shire is tracking on high levels of renewable energy uptake and wants to have the first community owned battery in Queensland. A community battery will allow householders and businesses to store their excess daytime solar generation and to take it back at nighttime.
Zero Emissions Sydney North (ZESN) emerged out of Zali Steggall’s 2019 Federal election campaign. ZESN’s approach is to focus on practical barriers to decarbonisation. They have developed a Sustainable Living Guide which identifies the top five things you can do at no or little expense such as how to switch to Greenpower, divest your superannuation from fossil fuel, how to decarbonise your house and your travel.
Hepburn Z-Net and the other Zero Net Energy Towns have developed their decarbonisation plans by following the same “blueprint” which is designed to help achieve 100% renewable energy over a period of 5-10 years.
Why Zero Emissions Brisbane and Zero-Net Kurilpa
In forming, both Zero Emissions Brisbane and Zero-Net Kurilpa, we have taken inspiration from all these groups. However, what works in regional Victoria or North Shore Sydney is not guaranteed to work in West End or the other 25 Wards across Brisbane.
The Zero Emissions Brisbane’s committee has been meeting since February 2021 and we have been meeting with Brisbane City Councillors to understand their current policies and programs. These meetings confirm that there is a role for politically non-partisan community groups such as Zero Emissions Brisbane and Zero-Net Kurilpa to call for stronger action on climate change.
In developing a community transition plan, Zero-net Kurilpa will be following the Zero-net Energy Town “blueprint”.
The first opportunity is to look at what 100% renewable energy and zero-net mobility might look like.
Practical barriers to decarbonising
For this to work, we need to work as a community and help each other. There are practical barriers to decarbonising a household, like upfront capital costs to swap out gas appliances or to install a solar panel.
Maybe you are renting, and you want help negotiating a conversation with your landlord or the body corporate. Or maybe you just don’t know where to start. Part of our focus will be about addressing the practical barriers to decarbonising. Left unaddressed, it is these barriers that will result in carbon lock-in and climate injustice.
Carbon lock-in results from not being able to afford the upfront capital costs to swap away from fossil fuelled technologies.
Policy Advocacy
As Zero Emissions Brisbane we are talking with the Brisbane City Council. We want to elevate the conversation beyond the “climate wars” and talk about the opportunities for decarbonising. What decarbonising means for Brisbane, what the new industries and job opportunities there are, and what this means at the local Ward level.
Foremost, we are advocating for a scientifically based target of 75% reduction by 2030 and Net zero emissions in Brisbane by 2035.
The first question for BCC – Australia’s largest and well resourced council – when are the carbon emissions from the City of Brisbane going to peak?
Secondly, who will step up and take responsibility for steering the decarbonisation transformation across the City of Brisbane?
Want to Get involved?
Through Zero Emissions Brisbane, we will be documenting our progress and actively seeking to collaborate with other community groups, businesses, academics and individuals to leverage our efforts. If you are keen to get involved, please get in contact.
Are you a student interested in applying your studies to real world sustainability projects? We may have opportunities for you.
Are you an Artist or Creative with ideas around communications and community engagement, please get in touch – your talents would be appreciated.
Please get in touch with us via our website and Facebook page.
In the meantime, see you around in the cafes and bars.
For more information
- ZeroEmissionsBrisbane.org.au
- City of Brisbane carbon emissions from snapshot data prepared by Ironbark Sustainability for Beyond Zero Emissions and the Zero Carbon Community. https://snapshotclimate.com.au/locality/municipality/australia/queensland/brisbane/2019
- Zero Emissions Noosa www.ZeroEmissionsNoosa.com.au
- www.ZeroSydneyNorth.org
- Zero Net Energy Towns Blueprint (z-net.org.au)
- Zero-net Kurilpa | Facebook
Cover image by Jan Bowman
The best measure of temperature of the global lower atmosphere is from satellite observations developed at NASA by Roy Spencer and a colleague, which began in 1979. This is the only source of whole-world data. Spencer’s data shows that the linear warming trade since 1979 is +0.13 C/decade. We don’t know how much of that warming is related to human activity. Spencer thinks it might be about half. That is, human activity may have led to a temperature rise of about 0.55C over the last 42 years. A recent paper in The European Physical Journal Plus has shown little change in impacts on precipitation, cyclones, floods, food yields etc. The authors conclude that on the basis of observations there is no indication of any impact from climate change to date. In addition, NASA’s Gavin Schmidt, a climate scientist who is a leading proponent of the dangerous warming case, confirms that the climate models are running too hot. Data shows that only two years in the last 25 are above the mean value of models used to project warming and to make a case for dangerous warming.
In short, there are no grounds for alarm about climate change. There are grounds for alarm in the impact of emissions reduction measures in Western countries (the rest of the world is increasing emissions), with severe energy crises, loss of supply and soaring prices in Europe and the US. Europe has also exposed itself to an aggressive Russia by becoming increasingly dependent on it for energy supplies, mainly gas.
You talk about “catastrophic climate change.” No-one who is well-informed on the issue could possibly consider that catastrophic change is in prospect. Far more people die from cold than heat, and warmer conditions foster plant growth with a lower usage of water per unit of growth.
Perhaps you could find some more serious issues to focus on, such as the rise of an aggressive China and Russia (boosted by increased use of fossil fuels) or the continued poverty in dictator-run countries around the globe.
For your information, I am an economist who has been engaged with the alleged dangerous warming issue since the 1980s, have been briefed on it by the IPCC’s Chief Scientist and have advised governments on it.